The work behind the code may be valuable, too

Engineering teams document bugs, discuss requirements, review changes and record how problems were resolved. Issue tickets, internal documentation and linked code changes may offer valuable context for AI systems learning software engineering tasks.

  • Ticket
  • Doc
  • Code Change
  • Review

What is AI data licensing?

AI developers study software tasks to build and evaluate systems that can understand requirements, investigate issues, modify code and assess fixes.

Data licensing lets an organization grant defined uses of eligible engineering records through a commercial agreement, without requiring it to stop using the underlying systems.

How the process works
  1. Existing records
  2. Defined licensing agreement
  3. AI development

The records behind the work

Here are examples of the types of collections we are interested in exploring.

  • Issue Tracker Records

    Bug reports, feature requests, incident tickets, acceptance criteria, status and resolution notes.

    Jira / Linear / GitHub Issues

  • Engineering Documentation

    Technical specifications, architecture notes, runbooks, decisions and internal knowledge-base pages.

    Confluence / Wiki / Markdown

  • Code Changes & Reviews

    Pull requests, commits, patches, review threads, approvals and merged changes.

    PR / Commit / Diff

  • Linked Resolution Histories

    Connections among the ticket, relevant repository version, implementation, review and outcome.

    Ticket ↔ PR ↔ Test

Discuss your data

Why AI developers need the full engineering trail

Code alone does not explain which problem a team was solving. A ticket and its linked documentation, implementation and review can provide an example of a real request carried through to a verified change.

  1. Bug report ticket
  2. Code diff and review
  3. Passing test result
  • Understand real developer requests

  • Connect issues to code patches

  • Interpret technical decisions

  • Evaluate proposed fixes against outcomes

A closed ticket tells a larger story

A good engineering record can connect the problem statement, design discussion, implemented patch and final verification. These relationships may be more useful than a disconnected issue export or repository snapshot.

  1. 1Bug or request
  2. 2Design / technical context
  3. 3Reviewed code change
  4. 4Verified resolution
Illustrative example

Start with a description, not your files

You do not need to upload confidential materials to begin a conversation.

  1. 1 Describe

    Tell us what collections, formats and systems your organization has, and approximately how much historical material exists.

  2. 2 Assess

    Argo Reach reviews potential relevance, collection structure, scale and buyer fit.

  3. 3 Explore

    If there is a potential match, discuss permitted use, access, preparation and commercial terms.

A bridge between specialized data and AI development

Your team ships software. Argo Reach helps assess whether eligible engineering records and their linked history may be relevant to AI model-development requirements.

  • Software-task qualification
  • Linked ticket-to-code context
  • Structured archive review
  • Commercial coordination
Discuss your data

Have years of engineering tickets and reviews?

Describe your issue trackers, documentation systems and code-review history. No repositories or confidential records need to be shared at this stage.

Any licensing requires appropriate rights and agreed permitted uses.

Discuss your data

Start with a description of your records. No files are needed for an initial conversation.

What types of data do you have? *

Select all that apply.

Optional
Optional

Please do not include confidential files or personal information at this stage.